Content Engine

A loop, not a content calendar.

We publish a week of content at a time, measure what landed — comments, sign-ups, citations in ChatGPT and Perplexity — and aim the next two weeks at it. Every cycle stands on the last one.

Written in your voice. Measured every cycle.

Why content plans fail

The calendar is out of date by week two.

Invisible to AI answers

Ranked for search, never cited by ChatGPT or Perplexity.

It sounds like AI

Generic posts nobody would attribute to the founder.

Nobody reads the results

Volume is tracked, effect on pipeline is not.

How the engine runs

Six steps, one loop every two weeks.

01
Audit
02
Position
03
Voice
04
Produce
05
Human gate
06
Measure
Step 05 is never skipped. Nothing publishes without a human.

Questions we get asked

The Content engine, answered.

Is this AI-written content?

AI drafts from your voice guide and your own material. Nothing publishes until you accept or edit it, and the next cycle is tuned on what actually landed.

Why no three-month calendar?

A plan written in January is a guess about March. We commit to two weeks, read what landed, and point the next two weeks at it. You still get a direction, just one that keeps correcting.

How much of the founder’s time does this need?

About an hour per cycle. One short interview to feed the voice guide up front, then approvals in the queue.

Same loop, three places.

A short audit of your funnel and data. You leave with a cited baseline and a prioritised architecture.